'Different Day': Republican Lawmakers Back Trump's Plan to Seize Funds From Congress

President Donald Trump’s administration is moving ahead with a strategy to implement budget reductions without seeking congressional consent, blatantly disregarding a statute that has been in place for five decades—meanwhile, several GOP legislators are openly supporting this notion.

Fox News reported Thursday The Trump Administration’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB), headed by Russell Vought who designed Project 2025, is preparing for an impending legal conflict. This arises as they plan to withhold funds previously approved by Congress. According to the network's informants, both Trump and Vought have been secretly planning to block the allocation of these funds to different governmental departments after Congress approves the necessary budget legislation.

However, under the Impoundment Control Act from 1974 , enacted during former President Richard Nixon's tenure, prevents presidents from withholding funds from federal agencies once Congress has specified spending limits. Furthermore, Section 8 of Article I of the U.S. Constitution specifically gives Congress the authority over financial matters, stating that only the legislative branch has the ability to "levy and gather taxes, duties, tariffs, and excise taxes" with the purpose of paying debts, ensuring national defense, and promoting the overall well-being of the United States.

READ MORE: Experts watch in dread as Trump launches a 'blatant assault on the legal profession.'

Based on information from Fox News, congressional Republican leadership has faced challenges gathering support for the continuing resolution (CR). This legislation maintains government agency funding similar to what was allocated under ex-President Joe Biden’s administration. However, Republicans became more willing to back the CR once key GOP figures informed them that these spending limits should be seen as ceilings—not floors—indicating that future reductions could potentially come into play without needing approval from Congress, possibly influenced by actions taken by Trump.

I believe appropriation is crucial; however, the head official has the authority to make calls for expenditures under that limit," Representative Chip Roy (R-Texas), part of the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus, explained to Fox News. "The head official could argue that this particular expense may not be the most efficient use of funds.

“By the way, I understand this implies that it would apply to Joe Biden as well as any future Democratic president, and I’m fine with that. There will always be room for discussion,” Roy added. “The courts may provide additional boundaries. Congress could also intervene to clarify the legislation, which might then be considered constitutional... however, asserting outright that the president cannot withhold funds seems inherently unconstitutional.”

Rep. Ralph Norman (R.S.C.) similarly expressed his support for transferring Congress’ authority over government spending to the White House, asserting that Trump possessed a “constitutional right” to undertake this action.

READ MORE: Trump aims to withhold funds that Congress has allocated, yet a 50-year-old statute might pose an obstacle.

The 1974 Impoundment Act targeted Richard Nixon," Norman stated. "Those times have changed.

Click here To review Fox's complete report.

Related Articles:

・ That isn’t part of his agenda": Trump clashes with Republicans over significant fiscal matter

・ Republican legislators remaining quiet as Trump 'tramples over Congress'

・ 'Significant concerns': Republican legislators are quietly 'irritated' with Trump’s budget reductions in conservative states.